AB 2011 vs SB 6: Which Housing Law Works Best for Your Property?
If you’re a developer, property owner, or investor in California, you’ve likely heard of AB 2011 and SB 6. These two housing streamlining laws, effective as of July 1, 2023, were created to unlock housing potential on commercial sites. But they work differently—and picking the right one could save you months of time, thousands in costs, and avoid unwanted public hearings.
At JDJ Consulting Group, we help clients evaluate which path fits their property best. Whether you’re looking to convert a strip mall into housing or unlock value from an underused office lot, understanding how each law works is your first step toward faster approvals and smarter investments.
Let’s dive into what makes AB 2011 vs SB 6 different—and how to know which one works best for your site.
AB 2011 – Affordable Housing Streamlining
- Applies to commercial corridors
- Labor standard: Prevailing wage + healthcare
- Requires 100% affordability (in most cases)
- By-right approvals with CEQA exemption
SB 6 – Neighborhood Homes Act
- Targets underutilized commercial zones
- Strong labor rules: Skilled & trained workforce
- Does not require affordability
- Does not exempt CEQA review
AB 2011 and SB 6 at a Glance: What’s the Difference?
Both AB 2011 and SB 6 aim to encourage residential development on commercially zoned properties. But they do it in very different ways:
AB 2011 offers by-right, CEQA-exempt approval if you meet strict requirements, especially around affordability.
SB 6 gives you flexibility—no affordability mandate—but it still requires discretionary approvals and compliance with CEQA unless paired with SB 35.
Here’s a quick comparison:
Table 1: Key Differences Between AB 2011 and SB 6
Feature | AB 2011 | SB 6 |
---|---|---|
Type of Approval | Ministerial (By-Right) | Discretionary (Subject to CEQA unless streamlined) |
CEQA Review | Exempt | Required (unless SB 35 is used) |
Affordability Requirement | Yes (15% minimum or 100% affordable) | No state mandate (local rules apply) |
Labor Standards | Prevailing wage + apprenticeship (≥50 units) | Skilled & trained workforce required |
Eligible Zones | Commercial corridors, office, parking | Commercial/office/retail sites, flexible zoning |
Approval Timelines | 90–180 days max | Varies by jurisdiction |
Bottom line:
If you want speed and can meet affordability rules, AB 2011 may be ideal.
If your project is market-rate and flexibility matters more, SB 6 might be a better match.
AB 2011 Explained: What It Is and When It Works Best
A Path for Affordable and Mixed-Income Housing on Commercial Sites
AB 2011, also known as the Affordable Housing and High-Road Jobs Act of 2022, allows developers to build housing by-right on sites that are currently zoned for commercial use—without needing a zone change.
This law is especially powerful because it exempts qualifying projects from CEQA, removing one of the biggest hurdles in California’s approval process. That means:
No environmental review delays
No discretionary public hearings
Faster path to building permits
But to qualify, you need to meet specific criteria.
Eligibility Checklist for AB 2011 Projects
Here are the basic requirements:
Site must be zoned for commercial, office, or parking use
Frontage must face a major commercial corridor (at least 70 feet wide)
Must include either:
100% affordable housing, or
Mixed-income housing with 15% of units set aside for low-income households
Additional site limitations include avoiding:
Sites with active industrial uses
Hazardous waste cleanup sites
Prime agricultural lands
Sensitive environmental or historic areas
Table 2: AB 2011 Project Requirements – Quick Reference
Requirement | AB 2011 – 100% Affordable Projects | AB 2011 – Mixed-Income Projects |
---|---|---|
Affordability | 100% units affordable | At least 15% units affordable (low-income) |
Lot Size | No minimum | Typically ≥0.5 acres |
Street Frontage | Any commercial street | Must be on commercial corridor (70 ft wide) |
Labor Compliance | Prevailing wage required | Prevailing wage + apprenticeship |
Height & Density | Local limits apply unless overridden | Can qualify for density bonuses |
Approval Timeline | 90 days (≤150 units); 180 days (>150) | Same |
Why Choose AB 2011?
AB 2011 is best for developers who:
Are building affordable or mixed-income housing
Want to avoid CEQA and discretionary reviews
Have sites on qualifying commercial corridors
Can meet state labor standards
In the next section, we’ll look at SB 6, its benefits, and where it may offer more flexibility for market-driven projects.
SB 6 Explained: When Flexibility Matters More Than Speed
A Path to Market-Rate Housing Without Affordability Mandates
SB 6, or the Middle-Class Housing Act, also opens up commercially zoned land for residential development. But unlike AB 2011, this law does not require affordable housing set-asides. That makes it especially attractive to developers pursuing market-rate projects—so long as they’re willing to go through the typical discretionary review process.
Think of SB 6 as a “permission slip” that says: you can build housing where only retail or office was allowed before, as long as you follow local rules and meet certain state labor standards.
But here’s the catch: you still need to go through CEQA unless you also qualify for SB 35.
What Kinds of Properties Qualify for SB 6?
Zoned for commercial or office uses
Located in urbanized areas (not rural or greenfield)
Must use at least 50% of total building area for residential
Not located in environmentally sensitive or protected zones
Unlike AB 2011, SB 6 does not require corridor frontage, giving you more site flexibility.
What Developers Like About SB 6
No affordability mandate – makes proformas easier for market-rate investors
Wider zoning flexibility – not limited to corridor frontage
Option to use SB 35 – get ministerial approval and CEQA exemption if project meets affordability & labor standards
But There Are Trade-Offs
CEQA applies (unless streamlined under SB 35)
Discretionary approval required – more room for delay, community opposition, or denial
Labor compliance still required – “skilled and trained workforce” rules apply
No guarantee of ministerial review
Which Law Is Right for Your Property? A Developer’s Decision Guide
Compare Your Goals, Site Features, and Timelines
Choosing between AB 2011 and SB 6 comes down to what kind of project you’re building, where it’s located, and how much control you want over the timeline.
Here’s a simple matrix to help visualize it:
Table 3: AB 2011 vs SB 6 – Decision Matrix for Developers
Decision Factor | AB 2011 | SB 6 |
---|---|---|
Speed of Approval | Faster (90–180 days) | Slower (discretionary CEQA process) |
CEQA Requirement | No (ministerial, exempt) | Yes (unless SB 35 applies) |
Affordable Housing | Required (15% or 100%) | Not required by state |
Project Type | Best for affordable/mixed-income | Good for market-rate or mixed-use flexibility |
Location Flexibility | Corridor-fronting commercial zones | Any commercial or office zones in urban area |
Discretionary Hearings | No | Yes |
Labor Standards | Prevailing wage + apprenticeship | Skilled/trained workforce (union rules) |
Ask Yourself These Questions Before Choosing
Do you want affordable units in your project?
Is your site on a commercial corridor with public access?
Do you want to avoid CEQA and get ministerial approvals?
Are you ready to meet union-level labor compliance?
Does your project need zoning flexibility not offered by AB 2011?
If you’re unsure how your property stacks up, our team at JDJ can run a quick feasibility review to compare both paths based on your goals.
How JDJ Consulting Group Helps Developers Understand AB 2011 and SB 6
Understanding the law is one thing—applying it to your real-world site is another.
At JDJ Consulting Group, we bridge the gap between legislation and land use. Our role is to help you figure out which pathway—AB 2011 or SB 6—can unlock the highest and best use for your site, while staying compliant and minimizing delays.
Here’s how we help:
Feasibility Studies That Go Beyond Zoning
We don’t just check your zoning and move on. Our team evaluates:
Eligibility under AB 2011 and SB 6
Corridor widths, frontage, and commercial use history
Affordable housing overlays and density limits
Whether your site can qualify for CEQA exemption
Physical constraints: slopes, setbacks, access issues
SB 35 applicability, if pairing with SB 6
Our reports include maps, density calculations, and a side-by-side legal pathway breakdown, so you can make informed choices.
Affordable Housing Modeling That Fits Your Budget
For developers exploring AB 2011, we help model how affordable housing affects:
Unit yield and layout
Revenue projections and equity ratios
Compatibility with local inclusionary housing rules
Whether density bonuses or fee waivers apply
We can help you fine-tune your unit mix to meet the 15% affordability rule while preserving financial viability.
Labor Standards & Union Compliance Guidance
Both laws require strict labor compliance—but they’re not the same.
We walk you through:
Prevailing wage and apprenticeship standards under AB 2011
Skilled and trained workforce rules required under SB 6
Coordination with licensed general contractors familiar with public labor laws
How to structure phased development if union compliance is a concern
Our network includes labor attorneys and cost consultants who understand how these laws affect your pro forma.
Permit Strategy and Agency Coordination
Once your path is clear, we help you build a roadmap to approval:
Entitlement timeline planning (ministerial vs discretionary)
Navigating LADBS, Planning, and Housing departments
Coordinating SB 35 applications where needed
Pre-submittal meetings and agency outreach
Managing Ready-to-Issue (RTI) status proactively
In other words, we don’t just advise—we execute your approval strategy.
Case Studies: How Developers Are Using AB 2011 and SB 6 Successfully
Let’s look at how real-world developers are using these two pathways—and how JDJ guided their decision-making:
Case Study 1: Converting a Retail Strip into 120 Units of Mixed-Income Housing
Location: Van Nuys, CA
Goal: Deliver fast, CEQA-exempt approvals with moderate affordability
Challenge: Narrow site, commercial frontage but heavy traffic
Solution: JDJ confirmed the 70-foot corridor width and 15% affordability compliance
Outcome: AB 2011 pathway allowed by-right approval in 90 days, no CEQA, and use of density bonus for parking reductions
Case Study 2: Market-Rate Multifamily Project on Office Lot
Location: Glendale, CA
Goal: Maximize market-rate units without affordability requirement
Challenge: Site not on qualifying corridor
Solution: JDJ recommended SB 6 with SB 35 overlay for streamlining
Outcome: Developer retained full market-rate flexibility and used SB 35 to avoid CEQA
Case Study 3: Exploring Both Options for a Vacant Mall Redevelopment
Location: Torrance, CA
Goal: Test feasibility of both laws before acquisition
Challenge: 7-acre site with freeway adjacency and mixed retail tenancy
Solution: JDJ conducted parallel AB 2011/SB 6 scenario modeling and phasing plan
Outcome: Developer opted for AB 2011 Phase 1 (100% affordable), SB 6 Phase 2 (market-rate) with long-term entitlements
Key Takeaways for Developers Comparing AB 2011 and SB 6
Choosing the right housing streamlining law isn’t just about what looks best on paper—it’s about what works best for your site, your timeline, and your business model.
Here’s a recap of what you need to consider:
AB 2011 – Best for Speed and Affordability
Ministerial approval with no CEQA review
Requires 15% or 100% affordable housing
Sites must be on qualifying commercial corridors
Strong option for nonprofit or mixed-income developers
Must meet prevailing wage and apprenticeship labor rules
SB 6 – Best for Flexibility and Market-Rate Projects
Discretionary approval process, CEQA still applies (unless SB 35 used)
No state-level affordability requirements
Sites can be any commercial or office-zoned parcel in urban areas
Labor rules require skilled and trained workforce
Often works well for mid-size infill or phased redevelopment
Summary Comparison Table
Feature | AB 2011 | SB 6 |
---|---|---|
Approval Type | Ministerial (By-Right) | Discretionary (CEQA applies) |
CEQA Requirement | No | Yes (unless SB 35 eligible) |
Affordable Housing Mandate | Yes (15%–100%) | No |
Eligible Sites | Commercial corridors only | Any commercial/office zone (urban) |
Labor Standards | Prevailing wage + apprenticeship | Skilled & trained workforce |
Best Fit For… | Fast-track affordable/mixed-income | Market-rate and flexible projects |
Conclusion – Get Strategic Help with Housing Streamlining Laws from JDJ Consulting Group
At the end of the day, AB 2011 and SB 6 are both powerful tools—but only if you know how to use them right.
Your site might seem like a strong candidate for AB 2011, but a corridor-width issue or labor requirement could make SB 6 the better route. Or maybe you’re not even sure where your property stands.
That’s where we come in.
JDJ Consulting Group works with developers, landowners, and real estate investors across California to unlock the highest and best use of their land. Our team provides:
Custom entitlement strategy based on your project’s needs
Detailed feasibility studies comparing AB 2011 and SB 6 paths
Permit expediting and agency coordination for faster timelines
Labor compliance support to avoid violations and delays
Affordable housing modeling to balance compliance and profits
We’ll help you clear red tape, reduce risk, and move confidently toward approvals—whether you’re planning 20 units or 200.
Ready to explore your options?
Our consultants are here to guide you through California’s evolving housing laws. Let’s talk about your property, your goals, and how we can streamline the path forward.
Call JDJ Consulting Group at (818) 233-0750 or contact us online to schedule your strategy session.
Is Your Property Eligible for AB 2011 or SB 6?
- 📍 Is your site in a commercial zone? → If yes, go to #2
- 🏘️ Is housing an allowable use by-right? → If not, you may need rezoning
- 💼 Can you meet labor requirements? → Prevailing wage (AB 2011) or Skilled & Trained (SB 6)
- 💰 Will your project include affordable units? → Required for AB 2011, not SB 6
- ✅ If all above = YES → You likely qualify for streamlined development
FAQs Regarding AB 2011 vs SB 6
What is the main difference between AB 2011 and SB 6?
AB 2011 offers ministerial approval with no CEQA review, while SB 6 uses a discretionary process that typically requires CEQA compliance.
Here’s a quick comparison:
AB 2011: Fast-track by-right process, affordability requirements
SB 6: Greater site flexibility, no state-mandated affordability, CEQA applies
AB 2011 works best on commercial corridors with high housing potential
SB 6 allows residential use on any urban commercial or office zone
Can I use AB 2011 or SB 6 if my site has zoning issues?
Yes, but it depends on your parcel’s zoning and location.
Here’s how to check eligibility:
AB 2011 only works if the parcel is in a commercial corridor zone with 70–85 ft ROW, and meets HCD’s technical requirements
SB 6 can apply to any office or commercial zone in an urban area
A custom feasibility study from JDJ Consulting can confirm your site’s eligibility and best strategy
Does AB 2011 exempt my project from CEQA?
Yes—AB 2011 is a CEQA-exempt pathway if all eligibility conditions are met.
Projects that qualify can bypass:
Environmental impact reports
Lengthy discretionary hearings
Third-party CEQA lawsuits
This can significantly cut down approval time and risk compared to SB 6.
Are there affordability requirements under SB 6?
No, SB 6 does not require any affordable housing units at the state level.
However, local inclusionary ordinances may still apply. Compare that to:
AB 2011’s mandatory 15% minimum affordability, or 100% in certain zones
SB 6’s focus is more on repurposing commercial sites without limiting unit mix
This makes SB 6 attractive for market-rate developers working within urban zoning.
What kind of labor rules apply under each law?
Both AB 2011 and SB 6 include strict labor standards:
AB 2011: Requires prevailing wage and use of a state-approved apprenticeship program
SB 6: Requires a skilled and trained workforce under California law
These conditions affect project costs and contractor options. JDJ helps developers navigate compliance early to avoid construction delays.
How can I know which law fits my project best?
That depends on your:
Site zoning and location
Housing type and affordability goals
Timeline, CEQA exposure, and political context
A professional entitlement strategy session with JDJ Consulting Group can help clarify which path—AB 2011, SB 6, or an alternate CEQA exemption—is the right fit for your development.
Use AB 2011 if…
- You want CEQA streamlining
- Your project includes affordable housing
- The site is on a commercial corridor
- You can meet prevailing wage + healthcare labor standards
Use SB 6 if…
- You don't plan to build affordable units
- You have access to CEQA consultants or mitigation strategies
- You prefer flexibility in unit types and design
- You meet skilled and trained labor requirements
Error: Contact form not found.
0 Responses